The sprint retrospective is a central element of Scrum, providing your team with the opportunity to reflect on collaboration and continuously improve. But what happens when expectations for the retro become so rigid that its actual purpose—learning and growing—fades into the background? This question often occupies my thoughts, as I frequently encounter varying needs and perspectives within my team as a Scrum Master.
Individual Formats vs. Expectations
In my retrospectives, I try to use creative and tailored formats to open up new perspectives and gain deeper insights into the team’s challenges. Recently, for example, I combined a retro with an introductory round to better integrate a new developer into the team. While some appreciated this idea, others expressed dissatisfaction, feeling they couldn’t focus enough on the past sprint. The feedback was clear: “Can’t we just have a proper retro?” This comment showed me how different expectations for a retrospective can be.
The Retro Is More Than a Vent for Frustration
Unfortunately, many team members see the retro primarily as a place to “vent” about the last sprint. While it’s important to address problems, this alone falls short. According to the Scrum Guide, the retrospective is not strictly defined—it’s a space for reflection and improvement on all levels: processes, collaboration, tools, and more. If we use the retro solely as an outlet for frustration, we lose sight of the bigger picture. Problems should be addressed during the sprint, not just at its end. Otherwise, negative emotions can build up and escalate.
Finding Balance: Structure and Flexibility
A good retrospective thrives on a balanced approach. It should provide space for addressing immediate issues while also focusing on long-term improvements. As a Scrum Master, I see it as my responsibility to help the team find this balance. Individual formats can help break entrenched thought patterns and introduce new ideas—but only if the team is open to them.
Making Retros More Effective
Clear communication of goals: At the start of every retro, the meeting’s goal should be clearly defined. Is it about immediate issues or long-term improvements? Or both?
Taking feedback seriously: The feedback round at the end helps me understand what worked well and what didn’t—but openness is required from both sides.
Addressing problems early: Teams should be encouraged to bring up challenges directly during the sprint instead of letting them pile up until the retro.
Maintaining flexibility: Standard formats like “Mad-Sad-Glad” or “Starfish” are helpful, but occasional variety can bring fresh energy to discussions.
Focusing on the bigger picture: In addition to sprint-specific topics, team-wide or process-related aspects should also be reflected upon.
Creating Space for Growth
The retrospective is much more than just an event for venting frustrations—it’s a tool for continuous improvement and a catalyst for change within the team. To fully unlock its value, you need to move away from rigid expectations and be willing to try new approaches. My goal remains to design retrospectives that solve short-term problems while also strengthening the team in the long run.
What do you think? What makes a truly great retrospective for you? Have you faced similar challenges? Share your thoughts in the comments!
コメント